Important as it is to learn how to study, it is singular that most students do not learn it, and that little effort is made to teach it. It is assumed that children know how to study because they have brains. Probably a large majority of our college graduates today have not learned how to study properly, and find it difficult or impossible to take up a new study and master it.
— How to study, by George Fillmore Swain, 1917, p. 4
How To Study - A reflection on how we learn
I was browsing the Cornell University Archive at archive.org when I came across a book from 1917 titled How to study. If you enjoy reading, it's well worth a look: it's 65 small pages that are a good read.
The first paragraph of the introduction makes a very useful point: students (and teachers) aren't taught how to study, and many never learn.
Swain also recommends The Principles and Practice of Teaching and Class Management by Joseph Landon, 1894, referenced below as "Landon Teaching".
I was never given training on "how to study" - either as a student or a teacher. I've gotten hints and tips from teachers, but most of the things I've learned along the way. How to study is one educator's advice from over a century ago; most of it is still useful, and still it is rarely taught. I'd like to add some tips I picked up as a teacher and a student.
If you don't care, you can't learn. You might be able to pass a class, but you won't be able to apply the knowledge to your life or career. Learning requires effort; and without motivation, you won't put in the effort.
Don't underestimate the importance of this: many students have failed their classes, or (perhaps even worse) passed without building the foundations they need for their future classes, because they think they don't need the class for anything they care to do.
In too many schools, really caring about learning in your classes immediately opens you up to hostility and mockery by your peers. That's done more harm than most of the misguided efforts to change education.
It seems this is a more serious issue today than 100 years ago: while I consider this the most important and most common problem, George Fillmore Swain didn't mention it until page 48 (out of 65).
A degree which simply means slipshod, unintelligent and uninterested study of a considerable number of subjects embraced in the curriculum, is verily a "scrap of paper" not worth having. — How to study p. 48
- Write hand-written notes.
Writing with pencil on paper engages your brain more effectively than listening, watching, or typing. Seeing things take a permanent, physical form makes the ideas themselves more permanent in your mind. Working your muscles activates other parts of your brain. Your spatial and visual abilities help you remember, when you decide where to place the notes on your paper, how large to write them, and how to arrange them.[1]A common way to remember people's names is to visualize people in different rooms of your house, sorting them by some easily-remembered characteristic. It's easy to forget things; but often the same thing you would have forgotten relying on thoughts alone are remembered when you write it down, and think about it as you're writing - even if you never refer to the paper again.[2]Try going grocery shopping for a few weeks, and compare how well you remember your list if you: (a) Think about your list but never write it down; (b) Write your list, but don't bring it to the store; (c) Write it and refer to it while in the store.
For most people, method (b) is much more effective than (a), and may even come close to method (c). - When something makes sense to you, write it down (especially if it didn't make sense before).
It seems every teacher has heard: "I understood it when you explained it, but I can't do it on my own." If you ever have an "aha!" moment, write down what "clicked." It may seem obvious and clear in the moment, but it's easy to forget - especially since you might have several other "aha!" moments (and times of staying confused) through the rest of the class. Those moments represent valuable effort on your part - don't waste them. They won't be cemented in your head until you try to apply them yourself - which often won't happen for hours or days. If you don't take good notes, you will lose most of them.
- Write it in words (or equations, or symbols) that you understand.
Too often, students think the job of note-taking is to copy what was on the board, exactly as it appeared on the board. Teachers don't care how well you can copy - instead, we care about how well you understand the concepts and how to apply them. Sometimes, you may be able to get a decent grade just by parroting back what the teacher told you. But that won't prepare you for a career, or for life. Take the opportunity to gain the skill of understanding, and it will serve you well in whatever you do.
Writing it in this way is a lot like explaining it to someone else - which, as every teacher knows, is a great way to learn something yourself. Often, you're explaining it to your future self (after you've forgotten it).
Similarly, taking excessive notes of everything that is said may fool you into thinking that you're learning and taking part, even though you're not spending any effort trying to understand what is being said.
If you don't understand the words (or equations, or symbols), find help - either your teacher, or other students, or read the book.
"A friend of mine visiting a school, was asked to examine a young class in geography. Glancing at the book, she said: 'Suppose you should dig a hole in the ground, hundreds of feet deep, how should you find it at the bottom—warmer or colder than on top?' None of the class replying, the teacher said: 'I'm sure they know, but I think you don't ask the question quite rightly. Let me try.' So, taking the book, she asked: 'In what condition is the interior of the globe?' and received the immediate answer from half the class at once: 'The interior of the globe is in a condition of igneous fusion!'Perhaps it may be thought that an incident like the foregoing would only occur in an elementary school. As a matter of fact, college students and graduates, and indeed most of us, do this very thing more often than we realize, even in subjects like mathematics or mechanics; and terms like "energy," "momentum," "rate of change," "period of vibration," "value," "social justice," etc., are often used without a clear understanding, and sometimes without any understanding at all, of what they mean.
"I would advise you to read with a pen in your hand, and enter in a little book short hints of what you find that is curious or that may be useful ... and as many of the terms of science are such as you cannot have met with in your common reading, and may therefore be unacquainted with, I think it would be well for you to have a good dictionary at hand to consult immediately when you meet a word you do not know the precise meaning of. This may at first seem troublesome and interrupting, but it is a trouble that will daily diminish, and you will daily find less and less occasion for your dictionary, as you will become more acquainted with the terms; and in the mean time you will read with more satisfaction because with more understanding."
It's easy to fool yourself into thinking you understand something. Recognize this fact, and train yourself out of it: don't accept the level of your understanding until you can make real claims yourself.
For math, science, and engineering, this usually means doing the homework problems. And you must be the one to do them: "students who copy over 30 percent of their homework problems... have over three times the failure rate of the rest of the students in spite of their starting the semester with equal ability in math and physics."[3]See news.mit.edu/2010/homework-copying-0318, phys.org/pdf188129641.pdf, and Patterns, correlates, and reduction of homework copying
For other types of study, where there aren't problems to solve, you should identify each main idea, rephrase it in ways you understand more clearly, argue for it and argue against it, see how it applies beyond the direct cases given, and explore any cases where it does not apply.
Reflect upon what is Read: Illustrate and Apply a Result after Reaching It, before Passing on to Something Else. -- Apply it to cases entirely different from those shown in the book, and try to observe how generally it is applicable. Do not leave it in the abstract. An infallible test of whether you understand what you have read is your ability to apply it, particularly to cases entirely different from those used in the book.
"It is not enough to know, we must also apply; it is not enough to will, we must also do."—Goethe.
I returned to study for my Ph.D. after teaching full-time for 13 years. This was the most important tip I picked up during that time. (I found it by necessity - no one suggested it to me.)
What worked for me: condense what I'd learned from the lectures, homework, and book, to a few pages per week. Solve all homework problems using only those few pages. If I needed anything for the homework that wasn't on those few pages, I needed to add it. If there was anything I didn't understand, I could form a clear question, and there was time to ask the professor about it.
It cost some time up-front, but it saved time in the long run by speeding up homework and exam studying, and improved my understanding (and grades) tremendously.
Things can seem easy if you only watch others doing something, without ever trying to do it yourself. Too often, group work ends up being like that.
Most students have had group projects where partners took what they needed from the group, never contributed much themselves, but still took a lot of pride in what was accomplished by everyone else. Don't be that person - you don't actually gain the skills you need, and others may resent when you pretend that you do.
Study groups are great for helping when you get stuck, and for keeping you accountable to keep up with the material. (Stick to your schedule.) But you should always try things yourself first, so you know what you need to ask from the group.
Work Independently of Others. — Solve your own difficulties and welcome them. Do not expect things to be easy. You will never gain strength by being shown, but only by the exercise of your own unaided powers. Therefore, do everything for yourself, so far as possible. Seek only suggestions from your teacher, when you need help, except in regard to mere matters of fact, which you could not be expected to reason out. Let the suggestions be as slight as possible.
If you have problems assigned, solve them entirely by yourself, even if you make mistakes. Then, when those mistakes are pointed out, consider them with great care and discover the causes for them, and remedy them, so that you will not again make the same mistake or one analogous to it. You should delight in discovering difficulties which give you an opportunity to test and increase your strength and so avoid future errors. In the same way, examinations should be welcomed, not dreaded. The teacher does not mark you—you mark yourself; the teacher merely records the mark. Even if you fail in the examination, that should indicate to you what you lack, and so be a benefit. Indeed, it is better to fail than to scrape through. There must be a line somewhere. The man just above the line passes, and the man just below the line fails. The former may not be as capable as the latter, but, having passed, he does not remedy his faults; while the man who has failed is required to remedy his. Huxley said that the next best thing to being right is to be completely and wholesomely wrong.
Homework is to help you learn general techniques; tests are to see how well you learned those general techniques. If you only know how to copy what someone else has done on a particular set of problems, you probably haven't learned the real ideas.
For as much homework as possible, set aside a time and place you can focus for as long as your tests will be (or longer). Start off using just the resources that will be available during the test. But because you haven't fully learned it yet, don't get frustrated if you get stuck: make note of what's confusing to you, and move on to the next question. Each thing you can complete on your own is a victory. Each thing you need help with is the reason you're in school - we expect you to need help.
With your list of questions in hand, you can spend most of your time on those things you really need help with.
Regular practice focusing on one topic for a long time prepares your brain for tests, and for the best sort of studying. No matter how quickly you can run down the block, you shouldn't think of running a marathon until you've built up your endurance - your body could not handle it - and that only comes through practice. The same is true for your brain and studying.
Most teachers and many students will find this scene familiar: Students are confused and raise their hands. Then, as soon as the teacher comes over to help, they suddenly answer their question.
This happened to me many times, both as a student and as a teacher.
There is not some psychic "teacher proximity effect." Instead, the act of forming a good question makes the issue so clear in our heads that often, we're able to answer the question ourselves. And even if you think you know your question, the act of preparing to speak it engages more of your brain - making it more likely you'll make a connection to something else you already understand.
As mentioned above, connections between ideas allow you to remember them.
If you're reading this, odds are you're procrastinating from studying. It's important to take breaks - but the best breaks from studying are totally different from what you've been doing.
So, put the computer to sleep, get up, and go outside. When you come back, get to the studying you're supposed to be doing. Bookmark this for another time.
"Active learning" has been promoted recently in education research, and is contrasted with "traditonal instruction". But Swain in 1917 noted "Keep the Mind Active and Alert. — Do not simply sit and gaze upon a book, expecting to have ideas come to you, but exert the mind." (p. 39)
Why is this so important? Among other things, we all often hold wrong ideas, and we must put in the effort to question, then to overpower the wrong ideas, before the right ideas can take root.
This is true in almost every field; it's especially clear in science. This was discussed nicely in "Minds of our Own"[4]a documentary produced by the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in 1997, "A Private Universe"[5]a documentary produced by the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in 1987, and "The key to effective educational science videos"[6]by Derek Muller, presented at TED@Sydney 2012
Well I think the fact that kids have these very rich ideas about the behavior of the world around them and their experiences is a flag that teaching science or learning science is a very ... laborious process... because these pictures that the kids have, these models, are very important to them. It's their whole view of the world, their whole way of living, and they're not going to by any natural process decide that it's time to change their ideas; they're precious, their current ideas, they're very precious to them.
Learning a new idea often means we have to change a deeply-held belief.
We know that changing the way you think about things can often be not just difficult, but emotionally taxing, because it means giving something up; it means letting go of some knowledge that you have used in the past; it means letting go of something while you're still unsure about what it is you're grasping after in terms of a new way of seeing things.
The thing is, in science, students don’t know “nothing” about what we’re trying to teach them, they actually know lots of things through their interaction with the world. It just turns out that these things are wrong, scientifically speaking.
So when you present something, the student thinks they already know it and they don’t really pay utmost attention. They don’t realize that what's being presented differs from their prior knowledge and they just get more confident in those things that they were thinking beforehand.
Just as no one can exercise for you to help you get stronger, no one can do the effort of learning for you. But that doesn't mean you have to do it on your own.
Some people are fairly good at figuring out how to train their muscles on their own; but almost everyone could use the help of a trainer to perform their best in a competition. For most of what you learn in high school and college, only a few people in each class can do it on their own - most need direction (and someone to hold them accountable for learning) to make much progress. And even those few tend to learn faster and deeper from a good teacher (since they don't know what they don't know).
Don't be ashamed to seek help. That's why teaching exists. And good teachers became teachers because we want to help people understand the ways real things work.
The only way that power and strength can be developed is by effort on the part of the student. The only real education is self-education. The best that the teacher can do for the student is to show him what he can do for himself and how he can do it.
But labor alone will not produce gains unless properly and intelligently directed. Misdirected labor, though honest and well-intentioned, may lead to naught; just as any virtue, such for instance, as perseverance, if misdirected or mis-applied, or in the wrong proportion, may become a vice. Hegel's dictum that anything carried to its extreme tends to become its opposite, has profound significance. A student may work hard and earnestly in school or college and yet accomplish little or nothing. He should, therefore, be made to see — not only the necessity for hard work, and how to work — but also how to work effectively.
Be Modest Intellectually, yet Self-reliant. Train Yourself to Love Correction. — Remember these sayings from wise men:
"Whoso loveth correction loveth knowledge;
But he that hateth reproof is brutish."
—Proverbs.
"Poverty and shame shall be to him that refuseth correction;
But he that regardeth reproof shall be honoured."
—Proverbs.
"The beginning of wisdom is the knowledge of one's faults."
—Epicurus.
"He that being often reproved hardeneth his neck
Shall suddenly be broken, and that without remedy."
—Proverbs.
"Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee;
Reprove a wise man and he will love thee."
—Proverbs.
"Be not wise in thine own eyes." — Proverbs.
"The true beginning of wisdom is the desire of discipline." —Wisdom of Solomon.
"Censure and criticism never hurt anybody. If false they can't hurt you unless you are wanting in manly character; and if true, they show a man his weak points, and forewarn him against failure and trouble." Gladstone.
"If there's anything worse than knowing too little, it's knowing too much. Education will broaden a narrow mind, but there's no cure for a big head. The best you can hope is that it will swell up and bust, and then, of course, there's nothing left. Poverty never spoils a good man, but prosperity often does. It's easy to stand hard times, because that's the only thing you can do, but in good times the fool-killer has to do night work." Lorimer: Letters from a Self-made Merchant to his Son at College.
"He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not, is a fool; shun him.Ask yourself, which of these classes you belong to.
He who knows not, and knows that he knows not, is a child; teach him.
He who knows, and knows not that he knows, is asleep; wake him.
He who knows, and knows that he knows, is wise; follow him."
Routine is powerful, and can lead in both good and bad directions. You need to harness it for good.
When you need to work on things you don't enjoy, every opportunity for distraction can seem irresistible. If you open yourself to opportunity (by leaving browser windows open, for example), and give into them regularly, you're digging a groove that makes it harder to be productive.
Instead, experiment to find how long you can focus, and what time of day works best for you. Commit to working, without distractions, for a set time.
And commit to taking breaks that are very different from what you had to do. For most students, that means getting up, getting out in fresh air, and engaging your muscles and your senses. By looking forward to these breaks, it becomes easier to endure necessary work, and avoid distractions. And often fresh insights come during them, that leave you ready, even happy, to return to work.
And don't forget: you are not a brain in a jar - you're a complete human being. The brain has trouble working well if the body is suffering. Giving your body proper nourishment, and getting proper exercise, makes your thoughts clearer and helps bring everything into focus.
If you care enough to invest years of intense effort, building a solid (and unglamorous) foundation, you're likely to succeed - mainly because you'll be willing to work through failures. But few people really know where their skills and passions are until they try to apply them.
High school and college are great places to learn whether you really want to do something (by doing a little of it), or if it's just something you thought you would like (or you were pressured into). For years, I thought I would like computer programming, since I like abstractions and math, and I like making things happen. Then I took my first programming class in college. I just did not care enough about the exercises to make much progress. Even later, I found that I love programming - but only if it's making progress toward a goal I understand and care about. That first experience proved to me that I wouldn't want to make my living as a computer programmer.
Be willing to try. Be willing to fail, and learn from your mistakes. Sometimes, the best lesson to learn is that you need to change paths.
Enough procrastinating. Put the computer to sleep, get up, and go outside. When you come back, get back to studying.
There were plenty of other gems that didn't seem to fit in the categories above. Find some others I liked, below.
Every student should, therefore, in the writer's opinion, take a systematic course in logic, or carefully study by himself such books as Jevon's "Elementary Lessons in Logic" or John Stuart Mills' "Logic"1
1"The Principles of Argumentation" by Baker and Huntington, is another excellent book, not treating of formal logic, but discussing the general principles which should govern the preparation of a paper or argument, the principles of evidence, and the logical fallacies in reasoning. It is recommended to readers. This book is, or has been, used in the course in English at Harvard University, and similar books are used in other colleges. A thorough training in English under a good teacher is a good training in logic, for clear and logical writing requires clear and logical thinking. Nevertheless, the writer strongly advocates the study of formal logic also.
Remember That a Statement is Not a Proof. Many Students Think They Prove a Statement by Merely Repeating It in Different Words. You Do Not Understand a Conclusion Unless You Can See the Steps in Its Logical Demonstration.
It is quite surprising how many students commit this error. For instance, if I am asked why can I see through glass and I reply, because it is transparent, I am giving no reason at all, for transparent means what can be seen through, so I am simply saying that I can see through glass because I can see through glass.
It will become evident from the foregoing that a fourth essential for proper study is mental initiative. The student must have a definite purpose, and must do what is the proper thing without it being suggested to him. He must not simply do as he is told. If he have not initiative and cannot develop it, he will probably never study intelligently, nor gain a thorough understanding of what he reads, but will merely memorize.
Memory is a most important faculty; it is not, however, a substitute for thought, but should be based upon it. Thinking is essential in order to decide what to memorize. Memory, however, is often made the sole factor in study. Fundamental principles should frequently be memorized, so that by numberless repetitions they may be permanently impressed upon the consciousness, and can be repeated verbatim as a guide in any concrete case where they are to be applied.
Do not attempt too wide a range of studies; otherwise you will dissipate your energy over so large an area as to do nothing well. This is not meant to unduly restrict studies, or to apply to matters taken up for recreation or amusement, but to point out that
Do not take up a subject of study lightly, but when you have taken it up, do not abandon it, unless there is some good cause for so doing. Knowing your own limitation of power and opportunity, learn to say no to any subject which may strike your fancy for the moment, but which would certainly lead you off from more important things. Unless you do this you are in danger of falling into one of the most serious mistakes a student can make, that of beginning a number of things, and then, when the first novelty has worn off, dropping them one by one for others with new attractions; so that, of many studies taken up, scarcely any are carried forward to a stage where the student can be said to really know anything about them, even of an elementary character.
This beginning many things and completing nothing, this frittering away of time and strength in glancing from one thing to another, is a habit easily fallen into, but it is one of the worst which the student can acquire, and tends to intellectual ruin.
Such a course not only wastes time, and prevents any work worthy of the name being done, but it often beguiles the student into the belief that he knows something of a subject because he has looked into it, and leads to that sham knowledge, that mere superficiality, which is so common. A smattering of this kind, which is worse than valueless, must not however be confused with elementary knowledge. The latter, so long as it is real and exact, is not to be despised, no matter how small its amount; the distinguishing mark of the smatterer is his vagueness and uncertainty.
The student should be precisely acquainted with the limits of his own knowledge, and endeavour to get some adequate idea of the extent of his subject. To put it paradoxically, he should know exactly what he knows, and what he does not know; otherwise he is apt to see the few things he has learned out of all proper relationship and proportion to the rest, and to over-estimate the amount of his possessions. Socrates said, "A knowledge of our ignorance is the first step toward true knowledge." It is impossible to know everything even of a single subject, the difficult and important thing is to know exactly what is fundamental, that it may receive attention first.
Have other advice, or other resources? Let me know, and I may add them to this page.